布尔津县法治文艺演出为群众送上普法文化大餐..
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
14 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 16 at 12:48 | vote | accept | Clap 'No Hands' Politics | ||
| Apr 16 at 8:40 | answer | added | PhilippMod | timeline score: 4 | |
| Apr 16 at 0:07 | comment | added | Italian Philosopher | Glad you are taking this in stride. I VTCd but did not not DV. However, this question has been asked before, I think: "is the military expected to obey Trump's questionable orders?" and part of the bad reaction seems to have been that it was seen as putting down Trump or re-asking something answered before. see politics.stackexchange.com/q/61583/21531. To be honest it felt a bit like that to me, but not enough to DV and it did look like a better fit on Law. Note that my linked Q is a lot less legal-technical in nature. | |
| Apr 15 at 23:59 | comment | added | Clap 'No Hands' Politics | @F1Krazy... Haha, I totally get why you'd ask! I had a separate tab open with the web browser, and I didn't refresh the page. I wrote that comment (and a few others) before I saw the edit Jen made. Really great question, though. And seriously, thanks so much for collaborating with me, nudging me along, and helping to keep things moving forward! | |
| Apr 15 at 23:56 | comment | added | Clap 'No Hands' Politics | @ItalianPhilosopher.... I welcome and appreciate your feedback good or bad actually—Politics post deleted—and I'd do it again at your recommendation. I don't think I've encountered a situation quite like this before, where everything unfolded the way it did (or as I noticed it timing wise). From the start, it felt like something was set up to work against me. I might have overanalyzed everything I was seeing, but it definitely gave me that impression. Still learning! Thank you! | |
| Apr 15 at 23:13 | comment | added | Italian Philosopher | I wrote the comment, stating my opinion that it was a better fit for SE.Law ( mostly because it is asking on the basis of precise legal statutes). That comment, needless to say, engaged precisely no moderator to migrate the question: they don't have to listen me, you don't have to listen to me. I do think that, once you had decided to post on SE.Law, you ought to have deleted the question here - you (probably) know how allergic the various SE communities are to cross-posting. But I wouldn't sweat it, your question is being engaged with and responded to, on SE.Law. | |
| Apr 15 at 22:04 | comment | added | F1Krazy | Jen already explained in their answer why they made that edit - I'm not sure why you're asking me about it. I don't know why you didn't receive any upvotes until after it was made - I can't speak for the upvoters (or non-upvoters, as it were) on Law.SE, so again, I don't know why you're asking me. As far as I am aware, such edits are not standard practice, but I may be wrong. | |
| Apr 15 at 21:50 | history | edited | Clap 'No Hands' Politics | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Fixed correct SE site referenced
|
| Apr 15 at 21:34 | vote | accept | Clap 'No Hands' Politics | ||
| Apr 16 at 12:48 | |||||
| Apr 15 at 21:32 | comment | added | Clap 'No Hands' Politics | @F1Krazy Why was my Law post edited to highlight the cross-post in the body of the question? Why didn’t I start receiving positive votes to counter the negative ones until after I made that edit? Is it standard practice to point out a compliant and correct cross-post in the question itself, instead of just leaving a comment? What’s the purpose of editing the question to call attention to this? | |
| Apr 15 at 21:16 | comment | added | F1Krazy | I think by "declined to migrate", they meant that the Politics.SE close-voters declined to migrate it, not that you personally did anything wrong. Why they declined to migrate, I can't say. | |
| Apr 15 at 21:05 | history | edited | Clap 'No Hands' Politics | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Added More Context section for where my mind was as a reader of this post.
|
| Apr 15 at 20:50 | answer | added | Jen | timeline score: 4 | |
| Apr 15 at 20:33 | history | asked | Clap 'No Hands' Politics | CC BY-SA 4.0 |